• Anaheim Ducks
  • Atlanta Thrashers
  • Boston Bruins
  • Buffalo Sabres
  • Calgary Flames
  • Carolina Hurricanes
  • Chicago Blackhawks
  • Colorado Avalanche
  • Columbus Blue Jackets
  • Dallas Stars
  • Detroit Red Wings
  • Edmonton Oilers
  • Florida Panthers
  • Los Angeles Kings
  • Minnesota Wild
  • Montreal Canadiens
  • Nashville Predators
  • New Jersey Devils
  • New York Islanders
  • New York Rangers
  • Ottawa Senators
  • Philadelphia Flyers
  • Phoenix Coyotes
  • Pittsburgh Penguins
  • San Jose Sharks
  • St. Louis Blues
  • Tampa Bay Lightning
  • Toronto Maple Leafs
  • Vancouver Canucks
  • Washington Capitals

HUGE Tuesday

Well it’s Tuesday and I have a full day of classes, which means I have nothing to do. Anyways, if anyone has ever watched local TV in the state of NY or Florida, you are probably familiar with Billy Fuccillo.

Why the Fuccillo metion? Well because tonight’s ice-dance at the Garden with the Islanders is:

HUGE

Yea, it’s huge.

Now I’m not a fan of calling games HUGE for a couple of reasons. For one, while the calendar turns from winter to spring, every game becomes “HUGE”.

Another reason why I hate calling games HUGE is because the term starts to be used about mid-January. Now when you start calling games HUGE then, what in gods name are you supposed to call them in march when you are playing nothing but divisional foes while you fight for a playoff spot?

But, I’m going to put aside my opinions on tonight’s game, because it is HUGE.

While we were idle last night, Boston got spanked by the Washington Ovechkin’s, Ottawa lost a cup-rematch to the Ducks, and Montreal lost a shootout to San Jose. That puts us in prime position to pick up some real-estate, and along the way possibly bury the Islanders a little more below the line.

Also, tonight the Bruins play the Panthers, Philly plays the Buffalo Slugs, NJ plays the Leafs, and the Pens are down in Tampa Bay.

All of those are favoring wins to all the teams we are fighting for a spot from. So that is why tonight’s game is HUGEEEEEEEEE-uh.

Plus Henrik needs his 30th win.

- Avery and the contract issues: ugh. I heard this first on HNIC HotStove. I have a couple of problems with this.

1) I would really like to NOT re-stich my less-than-a-year-old Avery jersey.

2) Bad time for contract talks. Yea we are on a great run, but its the last thing the team needs to worry about. Funny thing is it is probably driving Avery in his recent point streak.

3) Finally, the numbers. Many are saying don’t pay a cent over 3 mill a year or let him walk. I say give him 3.5-3.8 a year without a problem.

Many youngsters will be trying to come up next year with small contracts, which will make room. Also, what he brings to the ice really can’t be replaced. The closest replacement we have on the team right now would be Fredrik Sjostrom, but he would have to improve his English and smack talking :D .

But in all seriousness, its a tough situation.
I have a feeling he will sign before July 1st though.

Have a HUGE Tuesday, enjoy the game. 7 PM on MSG – Rob

Author Bio
Rob Luker

» View all articles filled by Rob Luker.
» Subscribe to Rob Luker's RSS feed here.
» Visit Rob Luker's website at: http://www.hockeyarena.net

More Articles by Rob Luker
AddThis Feed Button

3 Comments

Keep track of this discussion by subscribing to this post's RSS feed.

  1. Reason I said offer $3M as a final offer is because Avery himself approached management with tales of woe. He felt he wasn’t living up to his responsibilities on the team and that nobody would want him in the offseason. To me, that’s basically a guy asking to come back. And, if that’s the case, he should be willing to accept even a $2.2M-$2.5M per season salary for two years, and do his negotiating on the ice…

    At his peak, I’d agree to Avery getting $3.5-$3.8M Why not? His intangibles are worth a lot, at least according to anyone who has played with him…

    by Dan Rakusan on March 4th, 2008 at 2:40 PM EST
  2. Just to reference what I’m talking about, this is from the Feb 12th NY Post:

    “I talked to Sean last week about his contract, and he was down about the way he was playing,” Sather told The Post on Sunday. “He said he didn’t think anyone would want to sign him.

    “I told him that I did.”

    Rest of article at http://www.nypost.com/seven/02122008/sports/rangers/a_very_good_ranger_97299.htm

    by Dan Rakusan on March 4th, 2008 at 2:50 PM EST
  3. every game from here on in is huge, you lose 2or3 games and you could fall 4 spots in the east.

    by Bryen Owen on March 4th, 2008 at 5:14 PM EST

Sign in to comment

Not a member of RumorMeThis? Register here.

More NHL Articles


RumorMeThis: Hockey Links


View my page on Hockey Bloggers